Sunday, 2 April 2017

Positive medicine - 'alternative' therapies and spirituality

A good foot rub
"There is no alternative medicine, there is just medicine with evidence, and medicine without evidence(Tabish, 2008).
"There are a finite number of diseases in humans and they have patterns. Good, experienced physicians recognize these patterns quickly, especially for common diseases in primary care. Medical students and interns are notorious for taking hours to evaluate patients because they are learning and do not know what they are doing or how to interpret the information they are gathering.  Of course naturopaths, with an education consisting of pseudo-medicines like homeopathy, acupuncture and hydrotherapy and no postgraduate training, never get the opportunity to see and learn these patterns. So it is not a surprise they take hours to see a patient. It is the hallmark of the inexperienced novice." ScienceBasedMedicine
"When the institution of medicine in the West incorporated scientific methods as the standard of determining which treatments were safe and effective, and in understanding disease, over time almost everything that constituted 'traditional Western medicine' was overturned." ScienceBasedMedicine

I've spent some of my medschool winter holiday surfing with mates in the sunshine, doing yoga on beaches & rooftops, eating well on home turf, and generally feeling revitalised as a consequence.  I've also browsed the Holland & Barrett (health supplement shop) shelves to see what they're offering, and chatted with alternative health aficionados from as far afield as Costa Rica and Australia.  As usual, these approaches we the public have to attempt to influence our own health are often quite distinct from the therapies we medics learn about in the classroom.  I wrote an earlier review which reviewed and confirmed the position that behaviours (e.g. smoking, activity levels, obesity) in a developed country (the US) far outweigh the importance of medical care (by perhaps 4x) for our health.  So again setting medical care aside, I here aim to explore what alternative therapies have to offer to this model.

As we begin, we should consider the limitations that (1) research may not have been funded into all of these alternative approaches (large companies rarely stand to make a mint from it), (2) effectiveness and safety are important: a lack of research into for effectiveness may also imply a lack of research into risks.


Review of nutritional supplements à la Holland & Barrett (£700m market, UK; £400m in sports nutrition)
Now, there are perhaps 50,000 licensed drugs in the UK that you can get from your doctor or pharmacy, and a whole set more of supplements, herbal medicines etc. that you can buy too.  Some of these do work - I was surprised.  Not dramatically, but they may help.  Some of them don't help.  Here are a few highlights:

>Common colds: Zinc reduces length of common colds by 1 day (the average cold duration is perhaps 8 days), and is protective as a prophylactic treatment; in high physical stress individuals (e.g. marathon runners), Vitamin C reduces cold risk by 50% (NHS Choices 2011)
>Joint pain: glucosamine minimally reduces pain (NHS Choices 2011), omega-3 reduces pain in rheumatoid arthritis - and is contained in cod liver oil (Kremer et al., 1999)
>Skin firmness: hydrolysed collagen (Borumand, 2014)
>Infectious diarrhoea, IBS, lactose intolerance, and potentially necrotising enterocolitis: probiotics (NHS overview)
>IBS: enteric coated peppermint oil capsules (dry tea bags have lower levels of menthol oil in any case, and if present in the stomach this can relax the cardiac sphincter, leading to GORD)
>Chronic venous insufficiency and oedema: grape seed extract (University of Maryland)
>Hypertension & heart disease: Co-enzyme Q10 improves outcomes (DiNicolantonio et al., 2015)
>Slimming: vinegar (Kondo, 2009)

No effects (or no evidence of effects based on current research): Ginkgo & ginseng (dementia & cognitive decline), echinacea (common cold); chondroitin (joints), omega-3 fish oil (CVD, brain function) (NHS Choices 2011).  Also no strong evidence exists for coconut oil (various claims), turmeric (anti-inflammatory), oral aloe vera (diabetes), cranberry tablets (UTI), myrrh (mouth ulcers).
Unsafe but effective (many things!):  e.g. in slimming: guar gum, ephedra herb/ephedrine, tapeworm pills, laxatives (NHS Choices 2011)


Review of complementary and alternative therapies for diseases (£4.5 billion market, UK)

The **effective** complementary therapies for specific diseases
Some of these complementary therapies also work - though, only for a very small range of medical conditions.  Yet lots of the complementary therapies don't work at all to resolve health problems:

>Accupressure stimulation of point PC6 (those little metal travel wristbands) reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting - this has equivalent effects to antiemetics according to a Cochrane review 
Acupuncture: recommended by NICE for chronic lower back pain, tension-type headaches, migraine.  The location of the needles may not matter, and the effect size is small.
>Aromatherapy: ginger and blended ginger oil reduces postoperative nausea when inhaled (ginger is also recommended by NICE for morning sickness); lemon balm oil reduces dementia-related agitation when applied to skin
>Alexander technique: recommended by NICE for improving movement in Parkinson's disease 
>Osteopathy and chiropractic - as good as conventional therapy for persistent lower back pain
>Traditional Chinese medicine - I've only found effectiveness as an adjunct to Western medicine in schizophrenia.  Extraction and purification of artemisinin (antimalarial) has recently made the technology transfer to Western medicine - reinforcing that efficacy is a prerequisite for this transition, but also suggesting to me that it's worth waiting until careful research has bottomed out which of the thousands of traditional Chinese medicines actually work without causing harm.
>Ayurveda - yoga is recommended for lower back pain (Cochrane), may also help asthma symptoms (Cochrane).

The **ineffective** complementary therapies (i.e. they are not effective for any specific diseases):
Here be charlatans:

Homeopathy - no evidence
Reflexology - no evidence, minor effect noted on urinary symptoms in one study of MS patients 
Bowen technique - no evidence
Hypnotherapy - no strong evidence
Massage - no strong evidence in lower back pain or for neck pain, pressure ulcers, cancer pain.  Any benefits tends to be transient. Cochrane ; Cochrane (and hence you won't find NHS physios doing it)
Naturopathy - based on a belief in 'vitalism' or a life-force.  Consists of herbalism/accupuncture/reiki/colonic irrigation/hydrotherapy/energy therapy.  There is no evidence that the doctrine confers benefit beyond the subcomponents listed above Quackwatch
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM)  There is no strong evidence from Cochrane of effectiveness of any other Chinese herbal medicine for any condition in isolation (e.g. resistant hypertension, vasomotor menopausal symptoms, hypothyroidism, oesophageal cancer, and many more).  Note that TCM is based on pre-scientific philosophy of (a) yin/yang which offers no predictive power; (b) energy meridians for which no evidence exists, (c) the Galen-like five-phase theory of wood/metal/earth/fire/water to describe bodily function ScienceBasedMedicine.
Energy/touch therapy, e.g. Reiki, Healing Touch, Therapeutic touch, biofield, distant healing -  inconclusive evidence in pain, placebo onlyno reliable evidence.
VortexHealing - no evidence (and no evidence of anyone seeking evidence!)  


A new approach to wellbeing and stress reduction: valuing non-medical health interventions
As we read above, when it comes to treating disease, nutritional/herbal supplements and 'alternative' therapies are only effective in a rare minority of cases of disease.  But, this might be to miss the point slightly.  How do we qualify the wellbeing we get from a good foot rub, a pleasant-smelling room, a calm practitioner on a beautiful country retreat, a day in the surf, a revitalising meal or drinking session with a group of friends, the attention and engagement with someone who is confident that they're working with a therapy that has aeons of history, or a silent meditation in a giant religious building?

Extraordinarily, wellbeing extends lives.  Wellbeing incorporates features of low negative affect (emotion), high positive affect, sense of purpose in life and satisfaction, among other factors (Maccagnan et al., 2015).  High wellbeing (compared to low wellbeing) is estimated to improve life expectancy by 6 years when controlling for exercise, smoking and alcohol consumption (Diener & Chan, 2011 in Maccagnan et al., 2015).  Stressful social circumstances are also considered to be responsible for 20% of early deaths (see previous article). Wellbeing is correlated with healthy behaviours (not smoking, physical exercise, healthy diet, sun protection) and independently reduces risk of stroke and the common cold (Maccagnan et al., 2015).  We also know that positive emotion reduces cortisol levels, and improves neuroendocrine, inflammatory and cardiovascular responses (Ong, 2011Maccagnan et al., 2015).  So - wellbeing/stress reduction constitutes a relevant proxy target for reducing the burden of ill health.

The mechanism of wellbeing extending lives: could it be positive connectedness?  A consistent feature of alternative therapy is of social connectedness with the practitioner - an important UK topic given the prevalence of social disconnectedness and perceived isolation (e.g. affecting 1/3 of the elderly population).  Now come my conjectures: some of these alternative therapies may have their persistent appeal and mechanism beyond placebo through the process of doing something absorbing, pleasurable and connecting with a confident, caring professional 'friend', be that talking, experiencing a physical therapy by a practitioner, laughter.  This complete absorption in a state of consciousness outside ourselves may be a beneficial mechanism in other activities too, be that a shared consciousness in a group of friends, an absorbing 'presentness' in the physical world (for example waves crashing over your head).  Somehow, I suggest, the process of connecting positively with others and becoming absorbed in experiences quite different from our everyday stresses distract us beneficially from the internal monologue, provide perspective, and enhancing wellbeing.

So should we doctors be recommending alternative therapies?  Cost-aside, if a non-medical therapy does you no harm and makes you feel good, it likely has health value (money and time permitting).  The longer the feeling lasts the more worthwhile it is; in our high-stress and low-connectedness lives the more absorbing and personally connecting it is better.  An optimal schedule could perhaps even be determined for such therapies, based on how long the benefits endure, e.g. one article on massage draws from experiences in psychological therapy "increasing time intervals between sessions (e.g. 1, 4, 10 intervening days) is more effective over the long-term compared to a uniform schedule (e.g. 5, 5, 5 intervening days) of treatment delivery" (Tsao, 2007).  In a roundabout way, this offers me some theoretical context for not deriding, but in fact recommending such alternative therapy to my patients, in the right circumstances.


Alternatives to the alternative: economic data on non-medical approaches to wellbeing

There are clearly lots of things we spend time and money on that affect wellbeing, including the alternative therapies indicated above.

When one study asked Brits to quantify the value of various social experiences (using a neat methodology of translating social experiences into financial terms by identifying the incremental income gain that would offer the same increase in wellbeing):
£2,000 p.a. is the average value to a UK citizen of regularly attending a social group, e.g. a lunch club
£4,000 p.a. is the average value to a UK citizen of doing regular physical exercise
£55,000p.a. is the average value to a UK citizen of meeting friends once or twice a month
£85,000 p.a. is the average value to a UK citizen of getting together with friends every day or nearly every day

Similarly, taking holidays significantly increases wellbeing - and accounts for a large amount of real spending:
£25bn is spent annually on domestic tourism (i.e. by Brits in Britain)
£39bn is spent annually on overseas tourism (i.e. by Brits abroad)
£117bn is spent annually on leisure by Brits
£151bn is spent annually on healthcare in the UK across public and private sectors.

If we compare these annual expenditures on leisure and tourism (£181 billion per year) to the total spend on alternative medicine (a total of approximately £5 billion per year), we can see that the amounts spent on alternative medicine are comparatively small.

This should serve to temper the resistance of the medical community to these alternative therapies.  Since much of that leisure and tourism money is going towards wellbeing-focused activities, and much of alternative therapy may be considered similar wellbeing-focused activity, we should not undermine those alternative therapies any more than we should clamour to undermine people's choice to go on holiday.  Only, perhaps, when those alternative therapies are proposed as a *substitute* (rather than a supplement) for effective medical care.


A postscript - religion and meditation as a wellbeing activity (£1 billion annual spend on Church of England)
Now I'm in my thirties, I've joined the age that one religious leader shuffled on) - so I want to give a brief nod to religious affiliation (or lack of it) as a health consideration.

Data suggests religion also improves wellbeing.  This may be through the mechanisms of (1) social support, (2) a framework providing unique meaning for one's life, and (3) mutual respect regardless of personal circumstances.  In particular, it buffers against the effects of economic deprivation - reported across US and NZ studies. (Hoverd & Sibley, 2013).  Mindfulness-based meditation has also reported small to moderate effects on psychological stress (Goyal et al., 2013).  


So - although this won't redirect my considered approach to faith, I might therefore also think to enquire in consultation (alongside smoking, alcohol, exercise, social support) about patients' perceived stress and patients' participation in regular religious or meditative activities.  I may even suggest it among the options they have available when they're looking to improve their health.


Light relief to finish - some alternative therapy is not beyond deserving ridicule
Homeopathic A&E (by Mitchell & Webb)

Sunday, 5 March 2017

Five of my favourite - medical therapies in use today

Creative use of the appendix - Mitrofanoff
Ever wondered what happens when scientists daydream, mess around, and throw around ideas on late nights in the pub?  Sometimes nothing but sore heads and giggles.  Often nothing, of course.  The cutting edge science of yesterday was shaped through routines, big research agendas, pigeon steps.  But, just occasionally, a little bit of creative genius emerges.  I offer you, dear reader, a few moments to glance back and smile at some of the delightfully curious medical things these characters have developed which we still use today.

(1) Human menotropins - these are for women who do not ovulate due to a lack of the sex hormones FSH and LH, and are therefore infertile.  So what's the curiosity?  The source of these hormones - they're from the best available supply - the urine of postmenopausal women, purified, concentrated and injected!  This technique was first used in 1961, and 'Menopur' and similar drugs are still a significant part of the $3.5bn global infertility market.

(2) Mitrofanoff procedure - schooldays teach us of the appendix as a relatively superfluous evolutionary remnant.  Or, if you've been a little more recently schooled, as a reservoir to repopulate gut bacteria post-dysentery.  Well, for some patients, this little worm is exactly what they need for another purpose.  If the urethra becomes permanently blocked, or the need for recurrent self-catheterisation is painful and leads to scarring, a 'chimney' can be created between the bladder and a stoma on the skin surface using the appendix as the conduit.  Continence is therefore regained!

(3) Azithromycin - a commonly prescribed macrolide antibiotic drug.  For this, I'll reuse the words of an American pharmacist, who tell the story better than I could hope to.

"With azithromycin, we accidentally created the nearly perfect antibiotic. High concentrations at the site of infection where you need it, significantly lower concentrations everywhere else in the body where you don't need it, it kills a broad range of bacteria, and it has a built-in time release formula. Most people can take it with few to no side effects and allergic reactions are very uncommon (mostly due to the red dye in the pills but manufacturers no longer use the red dye).
How awesome is that? Doesn't that sound exactly like how you want an antibiotic to work?
When you take the medication, it gets absorbed by your phagocytes without damaging them. Phagocytes are part of your immune system, they are warriors sent in to fight bacteria and other infections. The phagocyte travels to the infection, eats up the bacteria, and then dies by bursting open. When the phagocyte pops, the azithromycin is released right there at the site of the infection. You take the medicine and your body naturally makes sure the drug concentrates exactly where the infection is located.
As days pass and your body fights off the infection, the phagocytes live longer because there is less bacteria to eat. When you're first sick and the infection is high, the phagocytes are dying faster and the concentration of the drug is higher. As you get better and the phagocytes live longer, the concentration of the drug tapers off to match the lower concentration of infection. Think of it as a natural time release formulation."
(4) Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy - so, some people just do blush a lot.  And some sweat a lot. This operation is one of those techniques that comes from the understanding that the autonomic nervous system controls the reactive response in the armpits, hands and face to stress.  To resolve these problems, small incisions are made in the armpits, a camera is inserted, and the sympathetic nerves are visualised and cut - 85% of patients report 'total satisfaction' with the outcome.

(5) Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis - to treat corneal blindness (i.e. irreparable scarring of the front of the eye).  This one is perhaps the most obscure of all.  A canine is removed, a hole is drilled in the root, a cylindrical lens is inserted in the root, and this is sewn into the cheek mucosa so it can grow a blood supply.  A patch of mucosa from the cheek is then sewn across the surface of the eye.  Two months later, the tooth-lens combination is inserted under the patch, and a hole is cut so light can enter the new lens.  This is simply extraordinary - and the autograft technique (using the patient's own tissue) is used to avoid tissue rejection.  This was first used in the 1960s, and is still predominant today.

Wow.
Thanks to Jason Gallier for review - watch this space for further guidance on faecal transplant (see EuroBiotix for a recent startup) and maggot therapy.

Sunday, 12 February 2017

Psychology - was the fish farmer right?

Media vs reality: psychiatric care
When I was 19, I worked some vacation days dredging out aquaculture ponds with a Harrietsham fish farmer who asked me "What use is it studying them 'ologies then - no good for getting a job?".  So - I'm writing now as I'm on my 5-week psychiatry rotation, and it's time for a bit of hindsight on the 6 years I spent with my head deep in psychology to see what I still need to learn.  My BSc (Hons) Psych took me up till 2005, and I spent 3 years of postgrad research work with it at King's, Kent and Dublin.   Life-affirming university social times alongside (which I wouldn't change for the world), what has the psych taught me that's of any use now, particularly in the medical career?

To put it to the test, as I was learning the academics of psych I worked under the impression that it could help me do 3 things - (1) understand myself - coming of age in my early 20s, (2) help people out suffering with their mental health and (3) develop some job skills / wield some influence on others.  There's also an unsurprising number (4) that's become apparent since - quirky psychology for pub chats, started in the Interval bar.  That it could definitely do...



(1) Did psychology improve my self awareness?  Yup!
Cognitive psychology - TICK - helped me understand how I learn and think
  • Ever wondered how your memory works?  Neural networks: learning and retrieval takes place in a network of interconnected nodes.  Hebb's law - the more one node is stimulated with another, the stronger their connection becomes (and hence learning information in context sticks better), and that's a way to restimulate those memory traces too.  I've found this ever since as a very simple way to understand memory and how familiar contexts can jog your memory.
  • Your thoughts and your feelings are separate but related - I hadn't distinguished the two as a child.  You can cognitively reappraise emotions and experience them differently (e.g. a man walks into you -> anger, then you realise he is blind -> empathy).  We also remember emotion-laden information better (you're not going to forget if someone tells you your grandpa has been crushed by a falling boulder), so if you can find personal relevance of facts you're trying to get into your head, all the better.
  • Brain structure is remarkably complex - when you get beyond the very basics of sensation, motor function, primitive emotion and language, higher functions like decision making and memory storage are diffusely represented in the brain, you can't slice through the brain tissue and pop these bits out.  This is cognitive neuropsychology, and taught me there are some things I'll never quite understand!


Child psychology - TICK exploring what a reasonable childhood should feature, may come in handy one day
  • What does the outcome of a good childhood look like?: I wrote my dissertation on this - determined that the goals of childhood are realignment of social relationships towards peers, development of identity and positive self-concept, preparation for the working role, development of morality.  A social worker I spoke with recently summarised simply the most important influence on this: "you have to have an adult who's invested in you".
  • Outcomes of adventure programmes: long-duration outdoor adventure programmes (1 month +) have greater effects on character (e.g. leadership, social competence & cooperation, independence); shorter duration programmes are more likely to influence outcomes that are closely taught at the time (e.g. mapreading, knowledge about boats).  And stretching tasks should be just within a child's limits.  However, doing this outcomes research didn't translate into any helpful suggestions to the course organisers!
  • Unconditional positive regard essentially means people blossom when they're accepted just as they are.  The idea was coined by a warm psychologist called Carl Rogers - and it features in good therapy, healthy parenting, and is one reason for the psychological benefits of having a faith.  A bit too passive when dealing with challenging behaviour in the workplace, I discovered (for a rather more cynical view of this, read Office Politics by Oliver James).


(2) Did psychology help me help others?  Not much yet...
Clinical Psychology & Psychopathology - good for context of how to gauge a problem and how services work TICK, just not immediately for skills in how to treat them CROSS!
  • Psychopathology is extraordinarily complex (297 disorders in DSM-IV) - every case with a varying set of family and personal dynamics that may be relevant to care.  Even the psychiatric labelling is contentious, as treatments for two patients with the same 'disease' may need to be vastly different.  That said, the psychiatrists helpfully discuss diagnostic labelling as a useful summary aid to communicating with each other (one doctor's acute stress reaction / early onset psychosis is immediately understandable by another, and provides some predictive power about the course of the disorder).  It emerged that there's still quite some disagreement about how to treat the mentally unwell, and the evidence for lots of the talking therapy is only modest.
  • Academic psychology heavily valued psychotherapy, which was a bit shortsighted.  There is a lack of research into many therapies aside from cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT: Australian Psych Society, 2010), though some more specific approaches, e.g. DBT for EUPD, family therapy in bipolar disorder & schizophrenia have an evidence base.  Focusing on CBT, the effect size is modest - if you're a CBT practitioner for moderately depressed patients, for just one of your patients to achieve a better result than placebo you'll need to treat 8 patients, and this is roughly comparable with antidepressant effectiveness: Cochrane).  As another way to look at it, 20% of patients on psychotherapy waiting lists for depression improve to 'recovery' by themselves, and approximately 32% of those that initially engage with psychotherapy move to 'recovery').  In schizophrenia, effect sizes of psychotherapy are also modest.  Essentially even if you're good at delivering talking therapy, you're not going to 'solve' most of the cases by yourself, you need the multi-disciplinary team, and much of that attention is aimed at managing rather than solving the case.
  • NHS psychiatric services' structure are nothing like as glamorous as Freud's academic setting with its chaise longue - the reality is waiting lists, regular medication, simple low-intensity interventions, community management, and the occasional hospital stay if things get too chaotic.  Here in Nottingham (and also much of the acute inpatient services in London), there isn't funding for psychological intervention as an inpatient.
  • In societies without mental health services, severely ill patients can either fester hidden by their families, or rave on the streets.  25% of countries in 2001 had no mental health legislation or basic psychiatric drugs available in primary care.
  • Inpatient psychiatric services seem to enable severely unwell patients to experience the basics on Maslow's hierarchy - stability, food, safety.
  • Emotions are contagious - if you engage with an angry man, you'll feel angry.  It's therefore emotionally exhausting spending all day with psychiatric patients - mental health professionals burn out.
  • When you're formulating (i.e. trying to understand) a psychiatric case, there's a structure to identifying the problem.  You can pick apart predisposing, precipitating, perpetuating and protective factors which explain the problem.
  • Patients with common mental health problems (mild depression, anxiety) often benefit from a bit of psychoeducation about this - for example helping them to understand what perpetuates their problems.
  • Every disease has a structure: antecedents, a course of development, symptoms, prognoses.  Understanding this structured categorisation of each was one of my spurs into medicine - that it could be understood.  Important not to neglect the social context, too.
  • The theories of psychology and psychiatry are irrelevant without practical exposure to patients.  Books about psychosis gave me little insight until I worked on wards; a psychology degree with any intention of preparing students for clinical work should therefore arrange some patient exposure as part of the course.
  • A good therapeutic relationship requires the therapist to be of stable mind and station - just like a reliable friend.
  • Neurological deficits can produce very unusual disorders of language and perception (as per Oliver Sacks' Man who mistook his wife for a hat).
  • There's no benefit to debriefing trauma victims en masse - it should be targeted.  Hearing this from David Clark put me off attempting to chase down a career providing the basics of psychology to victims of major disasters
  • Lots of people are lay counsellors - hairdressers, pub landlords, personal trainers, nurses - so the structured formulation/engagement approaches of clinical psychological input (e.g. socratic questioning to challenge negative thoughts, behavioural experiments, imagery, behavioural activation) have to show benefits beyond that of the softer supportive, chit-chat nonspecialised skillset.  While psychotherapists do have an edge in areas like structured motivational interviewing (substance abuse) and dialectical behaviour therapy (emotionally unstable personality disorder), David Richards & David Ekers (2016) have shown that simple behavioural activation techniques can be just as effective as the more complex CBT for depressed patients: Ockham's razor in action.
  • The only way to really get your head around your patient cases is to chat them over with other people, be it over a coffee or elsewhere.  Talking behind each others' backs is necessary.  I've Judy Cairns to thank for that tip.
  • It's possible to do an awful lot of tests and assessments on a patient, define their problems very specifically, but not necessarily have specific tools to help with those deficits.  I learned this with brain injured patients at Headway Ireland.  It's helpful to know the deficits, but the value lies in the patient's functional outcomes, mood outcomes, or others - not just in being able to label it.
After those years, I still knew almost nothing about... CROSS
  • How to structure the process of delivering basic psychological therapy to the neurotics: I had some basic pointers to offer people experiencing mild anxiety, depression and stress (relaxation; psychoeducation on exercise, eating, socialising, sleeping, doing something productive, structured reflective writing; behavioural experiments to try them out).  However, my 6 years in psychology gave me no confidence in how to deliver them.  Nick R (my mental health worker buddy's) simple take for counselling these mildly neurotic patients is helpful: during conversation it's a delicate art of having a menu of approaches at the back of your mind: say nothing/psychoeducate/prompt behavioural goals/challenge unhelpful thoughts/encourage mindfulness.  Similar to the advice you'd give a buddy in distress, but (1) you can medicate your patients, and (2) as docs we delegate the responsibility for taking distressed mates out for a bit of fun to various support workers/organisations.  
  • What to say / what drug or other interventions work with other mental health conditions: despite bits of exposure, I didn't have a structured management plan in mind for any of the rest of the gamut of disorders - just a slightly unclear sense of where psychological input could be relevant, with a rejected approach to diagnostic classifications and an insufficiently refined symptom-based model to replace it.  Now from medicine, I have a framework and a balanced approach for how to intervene (and where not) with patients with acute stress reactions, PTSD, OCD, adjustment disorder, bereavement, self-harm, anorexia, bipolar disorder, personality disorders, schizophrenia, balancing psychological, social and follow-up approaches with the medication in the care package.
  • Describing behavioural characteristics, though the years have granted me some helpful vocab to label characteristics in colleagues and patients (I loved Paul Blomfield's 'prickly'; Tom Craig's 'hostile and guarded'), it's not a confident framework I could draw from post-psych, and it's a helpful to be structured when teasing out premorbid personality from our patients.  Being prompted by this medical course to look back over the 16PF trait model (the Big Five) has been handy here. Warm/open/receptive vs unsentimental/reserved; self-controlled vs lively & tolerant of disorder; dominant&vigilant vs shy&deferential; emotionally stable vs tense&reactive; extroverted vs introverted.  It's often hard to pick the right word to describe people (18,000 terms in all, according to Allport & Odbert in the 1930s) - but satisfying when you find it.  


(3) Did psychology give me some general job skills?  Hmmm...
Occupational psychology - taught me nothing I could use in the workplace CROSS
  • As an HR job, OccuPsych has a role in recruitment: assessment centres (0.68) and work samples (0.54) are much better at predicting worker performance than 'instinctive' interviewing (0.33) or references (0.13). 
  • People also like their work varied.  Reality check though: these occupational psychologist characters have been noticeably absent in big business, I've not seen them evident anywhere I've ever worked.

Statistics and research - made a social science researcher of me, which was good in some jobs TICK
  • When you're reading a study, critique it in your mind and particularly the data work in it - many journalists misinterpret academic data, and ever more so these days stats are repeatedly Chinese-whisper requoted such that the context becomes lost - and that's assuming the academics collected it properly in the first place
  • Doing depth interviews is like taking a history - introduce in detail - and ask questions slowly and structuredly enough to be able to think while you ask (the PANSS scale was an excellent grounding in this).  Psychometrics we used (like the WAIS) are also much like the measures we use in Mental state assessment.
  • Giant funded research projects can be for nothing (our £4m Perceive project, and €€ Barretstown study as an example), but they do require a lot of careful organising to deliver their outcome.
  • If you're going to do research, join a team (my dissertation outdoor project was out on a limb)
  • It's possible to get very lost in written research detail - the real world of patients, business, travel, music, parties, family is out there, and it can't be understood only from books.
  • Almost anything can get published if you submit it to enough journals (and almost any topic can be measured).  This doesn't mean it's important.  
  • If you don't understand a subject, buy a book on it, (thanks Charlie)
  • But - all this academic rigour was clearly a little misplaced in my flirtations with BigData, technology market analyses and other research pieces while at Accenture - statistical rigour flies out of the window when people want key performance indicators - percentages are about all you need!

Dealing with difficult people - helped me accept them, no chance of using it for influence! CROSS
  • People's unreasonable behaviour can often be explained - even if it's not necessarily obvious at first - it's best to work on the assumption that the decision makes sense in those people's heads.  This doesn't mean it's a rational weighing up of pros and cons, however.
  • Diagnosing the challenging characters: handy technique for dealing with poor behaviour - label it, as some syndrome or a milder form of some personality disorder.  Aids explanation to your like-minded friends, but the clinical textbooks don't have techniques for dealing with difficult employees, though...
  • Attribution error: people are more likely, and incorrectly so, to attribute behaviour to dispositions (i.e. personality) rather than situations.  However, situation is far more important than disposition for predicting behaviour (picture the behaviour you have on a sportsfield vs that at the opera).  Good to be conscious of this to sidestep the focus if sparks start to fly.  Interestingly, major depressive patients are particularly prone to self-blame, i.e. internalise failure as due to their disposition rather than externalise it as due to others (Zahn et al., 2015)

Project organising - great - TICK TICK TICK
  • I wrote my first newspaper articles while an undergraduate (my first published piece was on animal testing in our psychology labs, now consigned to history), kept my first blog (now defunct), and organised more events than I can remember.  This is why I'm still writing today!
  • That said - the expectations are much greater when organising major corporate events, and the crowds tend to be a lot less grateful!

Relevance to medicine - you don't need a psychology degree to work here, but it helps TICK 
  • History taking and tests - we practised this in our PANSS depth interviews, we deployed endless psychometrics from WMS neuropsych tests to GAD-7, we had to tease out the aspects of the history from copious handwritten notes. 
  • Science must be translated into real life: understanding that it's irrelevant to view the science of medicine in a vacuum away from the services that deliver them, like you can't learn about parties from books alone.  This means I'm prioritising time spent on the ward during my rotations, and every time I'm learning about a service area on my rotations, I'm keeping some notes about how the services interrelate so I can understand them better.
  • Minor mental health intervention - familiarity with CBT theory and motivational interviewing in mental health has been helpful.  I'd like to drive the success of this home - it's a skillbase that can be useful in lots of places.  The puts the patient in the driving seat, since they've the ownership from having been proactive in finding the solutions to their problems.
  • Public health intervention - I appreciate the value of theory-based brief interventions for smoking, inactivity, poor diet, alcohol use.  These are the things which will most likely kill our patients.  I've developed a structure for brief stop-smoking advice, but would like a stronger approach on each of these.
  • Medicine in global health - I've reviewed the career pathways and delivery of psychological services through various job descriptions and project roles I've engaged with as part of my psychology (and consulting) career analyses, and this means I have a more rounded global context of how medicine is delivered globally too.
  • Concordance with medication - understanding in advance that patients may not do as they pledge (doing home physio, taking medications, etc.), and that they need to be involved and bought into the decision making 
  • Extraordinary processing: human language and vision requires extraordinarily complex neural processing.  For example - edge and shape recognition.  Hence - once the visual or linguistic parts of the brain are damaged we're decades behind able to apply a direct fix: a sobering insight in the importance of therapy in stroke patients but the limitations of surgery.
  • Outcomes-focus - it's been an important insight into myself that I like to see outcomes and gratitude for my work (hence insoluble problems aren't for me), and that I don't like to be restricted in my aspirations (hence being able to prescribe drugs and appraise the physical causes of psychiatric problems was important for me too).  This helps me with picking my specialty.
  • Research - I've been through ethics, delivery, publication before.  This helps.

    (4) Has psychology been good for pub chats?  Yup!
    Artificial intelligence - has made for a fascinating pub chats or two.  TICK
    • Computers can run a driverless car, they can beat people at chess, but they couldn't beat people at 'Go' while I studied - it's too instinctive, requires too much of a feel.  How things change.
    • Computers may also have the same processing power as the human brain by 2029.
    • Integration of artificial intelligence into clinical decision support tools with clinician workflows is tough, though some public symptom checker tools like iTriage are growing in popularity (50 million uses per year).

    Psychology is full of intriguing trivia TICK

    There's so much in psychology:

    Psychology can make you unusually hyperanalytical: CROSS
    • the undergrad schooling in how to critically assess questionnaires, and dismantle our closely held folk wisdoms doesn't always go down so well.  As an example, I've an inability to swallow those cod colour-based teamworking profiles and concepts of learning styles in the workplace.  Fortunately not quite to the point of "Do you love me?"  "Well, that depends what you mean by love, dear..." 

    And finally, was the fish man right?
    • The fish farmer may have had a point in that there was barely a mention of careers on the psych course - definitely a shortcoming, and despite a lot of students' interest, there wasn't a hint of scheduled clinical exposure, so we had to sort this out for ourselves.
    • But, I've never been short of work, largely on the back of the degree and the things I did alongside.  Fortunately a youthful critical mind, a few ideas and the rep that came with a degree-level education in a classical-ish-sounding-subject was more than enough.
    • One thing did become apparent about keeping my mind adequately occupied: while that summer's exercise on the fish farm was great, neither would the limited workout for the brain at a few fishponds cut it for me, and nor would a caseload of a few hundred psych patients carping on.  Without clinical supervision at home, that would be a little too much - a fish too far.

    Psychology comedy.  Ish.

    Thanks to Nick Rosewell for a thorough review, particularly for some of the academic references and reflections on talking therapy, and crystallising these thoughts over the years.

    Monday, 23 January 2017

    Six of my favourite - IT-enabled medical innovations in use today

    Ask the Midwife - 'appy days
    These tech-connected times are stirring things up in British healthcare.  

    Home-life has changed in the digital age: my transport and the UK taxi industry have been shaken up by Uber and sat-nav, eReviews have changed the way I shop, and around the world e-banking on mobile phones has made huge waves.  Likewise, the strong currents are shifting the creaking and oil-tanker-like NHS with all this available data, processing power and communication.  

    Nottingham & Derby hospitals now have flashy iPhones and iPads on most wards for recording vital signs and alerting the docs, as shiny as the First Aid apps on my phone.  But there's a general sense of disillusionment with IT in the hospitals, technology's Sisyphean burden being forever to labour but to always have more work to do - the shortcomings are always more apparent than the functionality.  Our ward desktop computers are renowned for their outages, for electronic medical records clunkier to search through than paper files, and for technology that lags far behind service changes and so forces juniors to be entering seemingly unnecessary data multiple times. The paper backup alternative is undoubtedly flexible, and fortunately budgets haven't reached the point of paper outages, yet.

    So, to try and give some balance, here are six of my favourite ways in which freely available data has developed our healthcare.


    (1) Symptom checkers and clinical decision support tools  

    Many free public symptom checkers are available, including the one behind the 111 NHS direct service, as well as big names like MayoClinic, Isabel and iTriage.  The last of these reports 50 million hits a year in the US, and has a funky avatar if you like pictures.  While widely used, don't ditch the professional yet: primary diagnosis by symptom checkers is currently correct in 34% of cases, and triage advice about whether to attend GP/hospital/self-care is correct in only 57% of cases (the algorithms tend to be risk-averse).  This in contrast with seeing a physician where diagnosis is typically 72% accurate using the same vignettes.  So - still some ground to cover, but the potential is growing (Semigran et al., 2015WSJ review).  A major challenge is for these to be integrated into existing healthcare workflows so more successes (e.g. alerts on GP systems about drug interactions) can be achieved.


    (2) GP - delivered quick (GPDQ) and Ask the Midwife 

    Too busy to go to your GP?  For £120 per 25 minute consultation, mobile doctors can be alerted and will come out to your workplace/hotel/home at your convenience (average turnaround - 90 minutes).  Currently available in London and Birmingham, with sister products out there in Australia and likely elsewhere.  Pricey, but nice if you can afford it.  And if you or someone you care about is with child, in need of a registered midwife, and you want some quick answers from the professionals, AsktheMidwife - for £15 you can have a detailed messaging chat within the hour with them.  Could make a good gift, that.

    (3) Radiological image sharing (PACS) 
    This is one for the medics.  The digital radiology images service is one of the most successful parts of the £11bn 2002-2011 NHS technology programme.  PACS enables images to be stored and viewed sequentially for each patient - meaning doctors can compare, for example, current and prior breast images to check for development of signs of cancer, or more acutely, whether an internal bleed is progressing and needs surgery.  Saves a lot of trips to the radiology basement archives.  Alongside PACS we now have electronic lab test results, e-prescriptions directly to the pharmacy, patients able to choose their dates for referral appointments and broadband across the hospital estate (although the programme didn't manage to implement the single patient record it hoped for).  PACS is the most visible of these though, and we may all be grateful for it someday.  As may your consultant who could be reporting on your image from a screen on the far side of the planet...



    (4) Choosing your doctor based on their results 
    Worried about an upcoming operation?  You can now browse surgical mortality and revision data by consultant (apparently about 25% of procedure information is on there so far); and through the same site can review the Care Quality Commission's inspection reports of your local GP practices/hospitals, which may be slightly more helpful than reading the ludicrously polarised patient-submitted feedback through NHS choices.  Transparency, while perhaps risky in the hands of those who aren't good at interpreting it (and likely to breed cautiousness on the part of surgeons not taking on difficult cases), certainly adds to competition.  Anna Powell-Smith and Ben Goldacre's OpenPrescribing has also now made it possible to review the prescribing patterns of your GP practice, in case you're curious.


    (5) Devices communicating wirelessly, e.g. pacemakers and pillboxes
    A pacemaker antenna sends a message to a home bedside base unit (e.g. at 3am), this logs alerts which are then flagged to the medical team as required.  This significantly reduces check-up visits for pacemakers (Burri & Senouf, 2009).  The communication tool has also come to market as the MedFolio pillbox (retailing at $160 per device in the US) - a study found low-cost, portable, user-friendly devices improve takeup (Hayes et al., 2006).  Just don't believe the hype about most of telehealth yet, it doesn't offer bang for its buck, so we're not going to see this on a major scale, yet.


    (6) Accessing your own electronic medical records
    98% of NHS patients can already electronically access their GP summary care records of medication, allergies and adverse reactions they've had, and the government intend patients by 2020 to be able to access all their test results, including hospital data, and also add to their own notes (!).  If we are to empower people to take ownership for their healthcare, there's much sense in this.  Despite confidentiality concerns expressed in the media, patients' NHS healthcare data has been analysed for service planning, research and epidemic-spotting since 1987 (see CPRD) - only 1 in 50 people have opted out, so with increased transparency we can expect the patients to take more control of their own data.

    And that's not to mention the many devices enabled by the processing power, from CT/MRI scanners to robotic surgery.  For skeptics who are still groaning on about the good old days of the NHS, before all this modernity when matron ruled with an iron fist, I commend Monty Python to thee...

    "But what have the Romans ever done for us...?"

    Update 2019: a great further set here

    Thanks to George Palmer of SendOwl for review and links to AsktheMidwife and OpenPrescribing

    Sunday, 8 January 2017

    Five of my favourite - medical innovations for the future

    Accelerated Vaccine Development - Ebola
    The average time taken from 'bench to bedside' of research evidence to health service change is approx 17 years, i.e. journal publication to practice (Morris et al, 2011).  I managed to get caught out at the end of last year when a sprightly registrar persuaded me that helping him do his latest bit of F1 doctor research could well change my job in 18 months time, it's really not the case.  With that in mind and planning towards the 2030s, here are my top 5 not-yet-on-the-market innovations that could be in my medical handbooks once I've completed my training...

    1) Psilocybin (as in magic mushrooms) for treatment-resistant depression.  Efforts are also underway with other psychoactives, including LSD and ketamine.  Carhart-Harris et al., 2016

    2) CRISPR, a gene splicing tool for genetic diseases - e.g. child-onset terminal diseases like beta-thalassaemia and adult-onset diseases like Huntington's. NatureVideo link

    3) Smart inhalers, which track patient usage - connected to mobile apps which include game-ified incentives for patients, and enable compliance to be recorded.  MobiHealth News

    4) NHS-accredited mobile apps to prescribe to patients - there are apps to assist with anxiety reduction, understand & auto-monitor your diabetes, diet, pain, and record your vitals through peripheral monitoring devices connected to your phone.  Roll this forward a decade and NICE should be recommending specific tools to docs so they can prescribe them to their patients ModernMedicineNetwork, NHS 2014-18 Five Year Forward View

    5) Phage therapy for bacterial infections - using one enemy on another, by deploying viruses that specifically destroy bacteria, with the advantage being that they can target particular strains of bacteria while leaving the rest of the body's microbiome intact.  Mind you, they have been known about since 1915, and none are ready for humans yet... Nature Magazine, primary lit

    + honourable mention to accelerated vaccine development, as trialled during the 2014-2016 West African Ebola outbreak NatureVideo link

    Sunday, 18 December 2016

    Positive medicine - getting stronger, getting fitter

    Surf workouts
    I'm away to unwind on a surf week to Taghazout, Morocco over New Years, with its killer whales and big breakers (I'll be starting on the nursery waves) and wondering how best to get in shape for it.  Boozy with lots of laughs & games w/nieces is the likely prep I'll do (since it's Christmas just before) but be good to know what I should be doing!  Over all these years of exercising (hillwalking, runs, swims, rides, football, climbs, racquetsports, capoeira, kayaking, surftrips, snowboarding, hockey, and very occasional gym/CrossFit sessions) I've never devoted much time to finding out what constitutes effective training, I've just worked on the basis of volume and a competitive streak.  The answer is unlikely to come up in our medical lectures: sports preparation falls a bit too much on the 'wellbeing' side for our 'heal-the-sick' focused course.

    So how generally to optimise strength/fitness?  What do I know already?  I've learned along the way to fuel before & after exercise, and my dad, once ripped back in the 70s, suggested to us as boys that pushing to the limits was good, and on strength building 3 sets of 8 was the way to go then to up the weight when it became too easy.  My triathlon buddies seem to blend interval and slow-paced runs into their endurance training.  My electrophysiologist buddy Marie suggested pushing to failure on the last set.  Let's see what a bit of research has to say about getting stronger and getting fitter...


    General principles of strength and fitness building
    Accepted advantages of exercise: energy, mood, sporting ability, improved sleep, stress tolerance, attractiveness, libido & sexual prowess (whoop!), alertness, weight management, improved immunity, chronic disease avoidance.  Strength & bulk-wise: some say this confers a perception of authoritativeness, and you might imagine some occasional practical application (lifting fallen trees from crushed cars is a rarity, though...)

    Tips on exercise motivation: ideally be doing an activity that you intrinsically love, vary the monotony of training formats, capitalise on supportive friends&family, make a plan, reward yourself, find a role model, develop your background knowledge, set goals, measure your performance against those goals, train socially.  Sounds reasonable enough.

    Nutrition - quantity:
    The body uses the same energy molecular currency 'ATP' everywhere. This is the end product of breakdown of carbohydrates, proteins, fats.  Adequate protein levels are necessary for tissue repair and muscle building, and fats are important for vitamin absorption and hormone production.

    During intense training periods, increased intake is recommended:
    1.3-1.8g protein/Kg/day (that'd be 104-144g for me, = 4 tins tuna or 4 chicken breasts or 20 eggs!) (Phillips & Van Loon, 2011)
    30-60 kcal/Kg, that'd be 2400-4800kcal for me, of which 30kcal/Kg should be carbs.  (Tarnopolsky, 2008)
    Lots of water, even better if this replaces electrolytes too post-exercise, particularly sodium.

    Nutrition - timing (I've used weak sources here, but I've found consistent guidance)
    3-4 days before endurance event: carb-load with 12g/Kg/day of low-GI foods (e.g. seeds, wholegrains) prior to an event to maximise glycogen stores
    3 hours before race: eat a small meal (400kcal) to allow insulin to normalise
    In the last 3 hours pre-event: keep drinking about a pint of water an hour
    Immediately before exercise: top-up a few mins before with a carb snack with a little protein
    During exercise: Isotonic carb drinks/snacks during exercise (i.e. take an energy bar to the beach).  If exercise lasts >2 hours, incorporate some protein into the fuel during the exercise to avoid muscle catabolism.
    Recovery: carb (1.5g/Kg in first 30 mins after exercise) w/ protein snack (~40g) post-exercise
    There's no evidence that splitting the diet into more than 3 meals a day makes a difference - many researchers have looked into this (Helms et al., 2014)


    Getting stronger - and building muscle
    Strength and power:
    Simply, strength = ability to lift things (force).  Power = ability to lift them fast (force x velocity).
    Weight training also offers a choice between strength increase and hypertrophy (muscle size) - it is possible to prioritise the look rather than the functional ability.  Functional goals first seem more my kind of principle...

    Frequency of exercise:
    Reps: 1-5 strength; 5-8 muscle hypertrophy & strength equally, 8-10 hypertrophy; 12+ endurance  (meathead wisdom, supported by Mangine et al., 2015)
    Sets: 2-3 for strength, this is 45% more effective than just 1 set.  (Krieger, 2009)
    Rest: 5mins for strength; 30-60secs for hypertrophy (one study suggests 3mins); 20-60secs for endurance (de Salles et al., 2009)
    Sessions: 3x per week is optimal for beginners to avoid mental fatigue, leaving at least 48h between the same exercise, and at least 1 full day off a week (therefore maximum 6x training per week)
    Vary your training across the week: using one day in the week to focus on each of strength, power and hypertrophy is best - thanks Rob for the intro to Daily Undulating Periodisation (Rhea et al., 2002)

    Features of the exercise (more meathead wisdom):
    • Compound exercises are most time-efficient (rather than isolating a specific muscle and working it, which means much more time in the gym would be required)
    • Free weights use more muscles than resistance machines - you use the stabilisation muscles too
    • Injury avoidance - proper form when lifting reduces injury risks, and barbells are best to avoid injuring yourself
    • Training to failure (i.e. until you can't do any more reps): this is exhausting, and may affect the rest of a workout leading to less overall work done, aka 'central fatigue'.  That said, the intensity may increase strength gains for the target muscle.  So - use it with consideration!
    • Specific exercises: squat and benchpress at least twice per week 
    • Endurance training decreases strength training performance - so cut the long runs if you're looking simply to strengthen up

    Getting fitter and faster
    What is fitness? (US Surgeon General, 1996, Ch3 p.72)
    (1) Cardiovascular capacity (heart contractility, left ventricle dilation, stroke volume)
    (2) Skeletal muscle adaptations (increase in number of mitochondria in muscle, more oxidative enzymes within mitochondria, better capillarisation, faster diffusion of oxygen and fuel into muscle, increase of fatigue-resistant slow-twitch muscle fibres)
    (3) Metabolic adaptations (better disposal of metabolic waste, increased use of fat as fuel)

    General tips on building fitness
    |A| A regular training stimulus is required for adaptation to occur and be maintained
    • adaptation: (1) after a power sprint session - 2 days; (2) after a VO2 max oxygen debt, e.g. hills session - 2 weeks; (3) after a long endurance session - 6 weeks.
    • detraining: this is significant within 2-4 weeks.  Fitness can be maintained despite a 70% reduction in training frequency/duration, as long as the intensity of that training is maintained, but if not then all functional gains are lost after 2-8 months (US Surgeon General, 1996, Ch3 p.72)
    |B| Structure your fitness training around the race calendar - so you peak at specific competitive events.
    • generally start with higher volume & low intensity, and adapt to lower volume & high intensity as competition approaches
    • 'periodise' into four week blocks, and make a focus out of each of the four-week blocks, e.g. strength, speed, power, technique, endurance or post-race active rest (Bazyler et al., 2015)
    • focus on skill acquisition in periods of lower training volume & intensity
    • taper off before competition (for 1-4 weeks, depending on how rapidly you detrain)
    |C| Vary your fitness training approach.
    • vary the intensity of training.  One coach recommends that 10% of your training should be faster than your race pace, i.e. if your 5km run pace is 6m15 miles, do 80% at 8min miles, 10% at 7min miles, 8% at 6min miles and 2% at 5min miles.  This 80:20 split of higher to lower intensity training is accepted wisdom for runners and other endurance athletes (Seiler & Tonnessen, 2009)
    • incorporate muscle-work: when strength training is the focus, use the gym.  High-force, low-velocity training at 80% of your 1 repetition maximum for 5 or 6 repetitions on relevant muscle groups yields the best results (even tho' lots of people don't like the gym!) (Bazyler et al., 2015)
    • have a calmer week every fourth week or so - helps you recover and stay fresh & keen
    • high intensity interval training (HIIT) incorporates short periods (e.g. 30s-5m) of maximal effort followed by a rest, preferably of active recovery.  There's no clear optimal level of the work:rest interval, but 1:2, 1:1, 2:1 are frequently mentioned, confers endurance benefits up to 2x per week (Seiler & Tonnessen, 2009)
    For those looking to burn fat: a moderate exercise intensity is best


    So what about the surfing?
    What's needed:
    - strength and endurance: bursts to catch the waves, endurance to paddle all day, balance and power to pop-up on uneven waves

    Use a surfing-specific training manual to make the plan:
    - Nutrition: pre-load with lots of high GI carbs, carb/protein snacks, energy drink, carb/protein recovery drinks
    - Warmup: follow the 7 surfing-specific dynamic routines
    - Swim (in the pool): interval training combining high intensity burst swimming (30-60s) with endurance work.
    - Strength @ home: HIIT the pull ups, push-ups, lunges, squats
    - Gym (1): full body/balance - deadlifts, overhead presses, single-leg squats/medicine ball tosses,
    - Gym (2): core - medicine ball / stability ball
    - Gym (3): shoulders&back - cable chops, bent rows, cable pulldowns etc.
    - Stretching: best done post-exercise


    And what next...
    So food's in the bag, exercise is in the mind (!), now for tagines, freshly caught fish, and NYE beach party...

    Local transport here we come

    Review credit - thanks to Rob Armstrong, including his important caveat that although general principles apply, everyone is genetically different, one size does not fit all, so you have to try things out to see what works for you.

    About Me

    My photo
    Medical student, keen on travel, piano, and the outdoors. Past work in psychological research and healthcare IT consulting.